Hmmm, Perhaps we should ignore this analysis (below). A different page shows 3 failed tests, all of which are because of the bug that was "fixed", but a test case wasn't updated.
I need to update the testcase... -Marshall On 9/29/2014 10:04 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > I took a look. It says some tests are failing to match expected XML strings > with what was produced. > > When I looked at the mis-compares, the expected were strings like: > <xml.tag ... attributes /> > > and the actual was the same except there was an explicit closing xml tag, for > instance for the above: > <xml.tag ... attributes></xml.tag> > > I'm guessing the JVM being used had a different xml impl. > > The log shows the jvm as > > $ f:\hudson\tools\java\latest-1.6-64/bin/java, on "windows1" machine which is > Windows 2008 Server build server (hudson-win.apache.org) > > If anyone has ideas on how to improve the tests (so consistent XML is > generated), please post replies :-) > > -Marshall > > On 9/29/2014 6:38 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: >> See <https://builds.apache.org/job/UIMA-SDK/org.apache.uima$uimaj-json/568/> >> >> >> > >
