I've made some good experiences with XMLUnit [1]. It compares XML trees for 
equivalency (what that is is quite configurable) instead of comparing them on 
the basis of their text serialization.

Cheers,

-- Richard

[1] http://xmlunit.sourceforge.net

On 30.09.2014, at 04:07, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hmmm,
> 
> Perhaps we should ignore this analysis (below).  A different page shows 3 
> failed
> tests, all of which are because of the bug that was "fixed", but a test case
> wasn't updated.
> 
> I need to update the testcase...
> 
> -Marshall
> 
> On 9/29/2014 10:04 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> I took a look.  It says some tests are failing to match expected XML strings
>> with what was produced.
>> 
>> When I looked at the mis-compares, the expected were strings like:
>>    <xml.tag   ... attributes />
>> 
>> and the actual was the same except there was an explicit closing xml tag, for
>> instance for the above:
>>    <xml.tag   ... attributes></xml.tag>
>> 
>> I'm guessing the JVM being used had a different xml impl.
>> 
>> The log shows the jvm as
>> 
>> $ f:\hudson\tools\java\latest-1.6-64/bin/java, on "windows1" machine which 
>> is Windows 2008 Server build server (hudson-win.apache.org)
>> 
>> If anyone has ideas on how to improve the tests (so consistent XML is
>> generated), please post replies :-)
>> 
>> -Marshall
>> 
>> On 9/29/2014 6:38 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
>>> See <https://builds.apache.org/job/UIMA-SDK/org.apache.uima$uimaj-json/568/>

Reply via email to