- Spot checked signatures - OK
- Built from source - OK
- issues fixed - OK
- Checked README, RELEASE_NOTES,LICENSE and NOTICE - OK
- Started Broker using startBroker.sh - OK
- Deployed Deploy_MeetingDetectorTAE.xml and ran a few test CASes - OK
- Installed UIMA and UIMA-AS eclipse plugins in eclipse Mars - OK
- artifacts.xml and content.xml still contain references to
repository name='file:/D:/work/workspace-textmarker-uima.... Unable to find
a fix for this. This does not effect the eclipse plugin - Not a blocker

[x] +1 OK to release

Jerry

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the UIMA-AS 2.8.1 release candidate 3 is ready for voting.
>
> This version contains the following fixes for problems found in RC2:
>
> Bug UIMA-4857 UIMA-AS: Fix NullPointerException
> Bug UIMA-4844 UIMA-AS: upgrade ActiveMQ(5.13.2), Jetty, xstream and lsf4j
> Improvement UIMA-4830 UIMA-AS: refactor SharedConnection code in the
> client
> Improvement UIMA-4828 UIMA-AS: fix documentation regarding process timeout
> Bug UIMA-4818 The UIMA-AS build generates Maven warnings
> Bug UIMA-4813 UIMA-AS: upgrade ActiveMQ to 5.13.1
> Bug UIMA-4812 UIMA-AS: fix CasManager.defineCasPool() was called twice by
> the same Analysis Engine
> Bug UIMA-4806 UIMA-AS: start broker in the foreground
>
> The list of changes in Jira:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%202.8.1AS%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA
>
> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/uima-as/2.8.1/rc3/
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1090
>
> The SVN tags are here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uima-as/tags/uima-as-2.8.1/
>
> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/eclipse-update-site/uima-as/
>
> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to
> test
> release candidates.
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0   Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks
>
>

Reply via email to