I'll remove the comment. Not sure I understand your point with the
output stream.
Am 03.08.2016 um 18:38 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> In the current design, I think the following code does not make much sense:
>
> // To support writing to ZIPs, the type system must be written separately
> from the CAS data
> if (typeOS != null && !typeSystemWritten) {
> writeTypeSystem(aCas, typeOS);
> typeSystemWritten = true;
> }
>
> Originally, this was meant to support writing to ZIPs. But in the original
> code, the OutputStream
> was the obtained later, i.e. inside the writeTypeSystem() call. It is not
> possible to obtain
> an OutputStream for a "future" position in the ZIP file.
>
> So I wonder if this part of the code should be changed such that a type
> system is always written
> to the TS output stream if that stream is null.
>
> At least the comment should be removed.
>
> -- Richard
