Sorry, probably I'm being dense ;) So for V2, I'm pretty sure that this didn't "just work", but I gather you say that for V3, this really does work?
Cheers, -- Richard > On 21.11.2016, at 22:46, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm probably being dense, but I'm not sure why it wouldn't just work: > > Foo : a JCas gen'd class > > SubFoo extends Foo - the subclass > > new SubFoo(jcas) would create a new feature structure, assuming the > constructor > called its superconstructor (as is normally the case). > > mySubFooInstance.getFeatureXyz() - this would be implemented in the super > class, and work fine, I think, as would the setters... > > -Marshall
