there's plenty of denseness to go around :-) I think this ought to work in v2 as well? Can you say a scenario where it wouldn't?
-Marshall On 11/21/2016 4:49 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > Sorry, probably I'm being dense ;) So for V2, I'm pretty sure that this > didn't "just work", but I gather you say that for V3, this really does > work? > > Cheers, > > -- Richard > >> On 21.11.2016, at 22:46, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm probably being dense, but I'm not sure why it wouldn't just work: >> >> Foo : a JCas gen'd class >> >> SubFoo extends Foo - the subclass >> >> new SubFoo(jcas) would create a new feature structure, assuming the >> constructor >> called its superconstructor (as is normally the case). >> >> mySubFooInstance.getFeatureXyz() - this would be implemented in the super >> class, and work fine, I think, as would the setters... >> >> -Marshall >
