Yes, there's a check box that says to show all available versions. I googled to see if could be "set" by the update site somehow, found out that Eclipse help says it's checked by default; so I don't think this can be fixed. I posted a note about this to uima-user.
-M On 2/1/2017 5:53 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > When installing the features in Eclipse with the initial set checkboxes, > only the 3.0.0.alpha release is visible. Could happen that someone not > checking the versions installs the alpha release by accident. > > > Just wanted to mention it. This is a bit suboptimal but I also do not > know any improvement. > > > Peter > > > Am 01.02.2017 um 11:45 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: >>> On 30.01.2017, at 15:39, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 1/30/2017 8:24 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote: >>>> +1 to release this alpha version. This will help us to gather feedback from >>>> our community. >>>> >>>> The minor issues pointed out here can be fixed with the next alpha >>>> version(s). And we should try to release updates to the alpha version >>>> frequently. (also when its a low number of jiras fixed). >>> good idea. Do you mean things like 3.0.0-alpha1, 3.0.0-alpha2, etc. ? or >>> do you >>> have a better naming convention in mind? >> Applause for the first v3 alpha release! I hope being able to play with it >> in the not so far away future... unfortunately, the start of this year is >> unusually busy for me. >> >> I think "3.0.0-alpha-1", "3.0.0-alpha-2" are pretty good until we eventually >> switch to 3.0.0-beta-1" and finally to "3.0.0" ;) >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Richard >
