On 06.02.2017, at 21:39, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > now considering not using logback except via eclipse plugin dependency, to > avoid > license reciprocity issue. > > For normal binary packaging, would use slf4j + some backend, perhaps log4j 2. > > These would be "excluded" for the OSGi packaging.
UIMA as a library should not have dependencies on a particular logging backend. I guess when you talk about "normal binary packaging" you mean the binary release package that we do, right? So these instead of "excluding" a logging backend for OSGi, I think it would rather be "including" a logging backend only for OSGi and the binary packaging but not having it in any other way as a dependency in any POM (except maybe as a test dependency). -- Richard
