[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15866739#comment-15866739
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-5322:
--------------------------------------
If the goal of backwards compatibility is acheived and you regenerate the JCas
classes, then one source tree should be sufficient?
I can see that if you want two source trees so you can begin to exploit Java 8,
but want to keep a Java 7 only version, then having 2 trees makes sense.
> Create copy of uimaFIT source tree to be based on UIMA v3
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-5322
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5322
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: uimaFIT, uimaFIT-Maven-Plugin
> Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
> Fix For: 3.0.0uimaFIT
>
>
> Create copy of uimaFIT source tree to be based on UIMA v3
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
