Hm, the present Log4jLogger_impl maps CONFIG to INFO. I didn't find this annoying so far. I've never used CONFIG in any of my code - I think.
Not familiar with "markers" here either. Cheers, -- Richard > On 21.02.2017, at 22:58, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Might be a question for Richard, since he's substituted log4j logger in UIMA > (from previous notes). > > Log4j and Slf4j and Logback don't have the "CONFIG" level, which UIMA > framework > makes quite a bit of use of. > > Is there a way this is handled? In particular, CONFIG is (in normal test > cases) > set so it doesn't log, but INFO does. If CONFIG is mapped to INFO, then the > tests produce a log more logging. > > Just wondering if others have come up with a good way to handle this. > > > I know log4j 2 supports "adding 'user-defined' levels". Slf4j and Logback > seem > strongly against new log levels; there were suggestions I saw to use "markers" > instead. > > -Marshall
