Hi,
I've read the page on our website and even remembered what we did years ago when the composite site was refactored. I am of course aware of our time difference and I planned to wait for your response, but then I just gave it a try and it worked better than expected. Do you think that could be a problem for the RC? Best, Peter Am 25.11.2019 um 16:55 schrieb Marshall Schor: > Hi, > > I found a bunch of stuff from my last work on composite update sites (and > plain > update sites), and found I had not check these into svn. I've just fixed > that... > > These are in the "build" set of projects: uima-eclipse-composite-update-site > (was updated previously to set up the version 3 composite update site), and > uima-eclipse-update-site-removing - a small utility for running eclipse > utilities to remove older update sites. There's also a > uima-eclipse-update-site-slicing - used when you want to move some older > update > sites to an "archive" spot. > > Here's a quick summary: Because uima v3 things are not compatible with v2 > things > (due to JCas being different), we have 2 eclipse update composite sites: The > v2 > one is "eclipse-update-site", The v3 one is "eclipse-update-site-v3". > > (We also have another update site, called "archive-eclipse-update-site" - > which > you should use to move much older and no longer actively needed versions (but > which you still want users to be able to find if needed). > > Our website downloads page has a section for Eclipse Update Sites which also > has > these links, and reference to the archive: > > http://uima.apache.org/downloads.cgi#Eclipse%20Update%20Site > > The page > https://uima.apache.org/eclipse-update-site.html#Composite%20Update%20Sites on > our website (linked from the left-hand nav bar) has instructions (which ought > to > be reviewed for correctness / sanity / :-) ) on how to update the composite > site(s) when needed. > > see > https://uima.apache.org/eclipse-update-site.html#Composite%20Update%20Sites > > Finally, remember you have the option of "signing" the Jars used in the update > site, so that when users install your plugins, they no longer get those > messages > about "you are about to install unsigned .... ". Instructions for how to do > this are here: > https://uima.apache.org/dev-eclipse-plugin-signing.html (probably need to add > more links to this. There's one in the > https://uima.apache.org/checklist-release.html doc... > > -Marshall > > On 11/25/2019 4:06 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I wonder how the Ruta v3 update is released and how I should prepare the RC. >> >> >> There is no subsite yet, so I assume the composite update site needs to >> be updated and thus also needs to be reviewed/released. >> >> Should we do that in one process or in two? Should the RC for the update >> site contain only the subsite as we normally do it or should I prepare a >> complete update site including uimaj and an updated composite? >> >> >> I think I go with the second option... opinions? >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> Peter >> >> -- Dr. Peter Klügl R&D Text Mining/Machine Learning Averbis GmbH Salzstr. 15 79098 Freiburg Germany Fon: +49 761 708 394 0 Fax: +49 761 708 394 10 Email: [email protected] Web: https://averbis.com Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080 Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó
