[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17029855#comment-17029855
 ] 

Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-6185:
--------------------------------------

I think these kinds of proposals/changes should be discussed more transparently.

It seems to me that locking down versions is only (historically) needed very 
occasionally.

If a version needs to be locked down, I would rather see it done at the project 
level, rather than at a uima-wide level, unless there is a known issue that 
affects everything.

And then, for those issues, I would suggest a big comment in the file locking 
it down, pointing to the reasons ( a Jira issue or other explanation) as to why 
this is being done.

So my view is not to lock these down in the uima-wide pom, unless we know of a 
requirement that spans all (or at least most) of our projects.

Other views pro / con ?

> Upgrade parent POM plugins
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-6185
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6185
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build, Packaging and Test
>            Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: parent-pom-14
>
>
> * upgrade to Apache parent POM 23
> * upgrade Maven plugin versions where feasible



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to