Hi Abdelkader,
yes, it's an Apache requirement: as we are in incubator podling, the
release version has to contain *incubating* to indicate we are in the
incubator.
Regards
JB
On 12/02/2015 10:36 AM, Abdelkader Midani wrote:
+1 for 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
is incubating needed (is an Apache requirements) ?
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT would be more sexy
Cordialement / Best regards
Abdelkader Midani
Senior Software Engineer
T +33 1 44 79 37 99 | M +33 6 72 57 93 40
8 rue du Sentier | 75002 Paris | France
jahia.com <http://www.jahia.com/>
SKYPE <skype:abdelkader.midani?add> | TWITTER
<https://twitter.com/M_Abdel> | VCARD
<http://www.jahia.com/vcard/MidaniAbdelkader.vcf>
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/> to evaluate, get trained and to
discover why
Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for Digital
Transformation.
On 2 Dec 2015, at 10:27, Serge Huber <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi guys,
As we are getting closer to a first release (yeah !), I’d like to
propose something about the version number of Apache Unomi.
Currently it is at 2.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, which was mostly to
differentiate from the 1.0.X version that we had outside of Apache,
but I’m thinking more and more this doesn’t make much sense from the
Apache point of view.
I’d like to propose that we go to 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT and
therefore our first release would be at 1.0.0-incubating. I’m not that
found of 0.x numbers, especially since in my company we consider the
current code as good enough for production environments, and I
generally tend to think that if something can be used in production it
should have a “major” version number.
However this does beg the question of how do we map the Unomi version
number to the CXS specification. As the specification is still
evolving, I propose that we do something similar to what Apache Tomcat
has done and provide a version mapping page such as this one :
https://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html and that we can then
freely perform releases of working and useful code and still map it to
the spec as we want.
What do you think ?
Best regards,
Serge…
ps : lazy consensus will apply here :)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
