Hi Jean-Baptiste, Thanks, it makes more sense for me Cordialement / Best regards
Abdelkader Midani Senior Software Engineer T +33 1 44 79 37 99 | M +33 6 72 57 93 40 8 rue du Sentier | 75002 Paris | France jahia.com <http://www.jahia.com/> SKYPE <skype:abdelkader.midani?add> | TWITTER <https://twitter.com/M_Abdel> | VCARD <http://www.jahia.com/vcard/MidaniAbdelkader.vcf> > JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/> to evaluate, get trained and to > discover why Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for Digital > Transformation. > On 2 Dec 2015, at 10:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Abdelkader, > > yes, it's an Apache requirement: as we are in incubator podling, the release > version has to contain *incubating* to indicate we are in the incubator. > > Regards > JB > > On 12/02/2015 10:36 AM, Abdelkader Midani wrote: >> +1 for 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT >> >> is incubating needed (is an Apache requirements) ? >> >> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT would be more sexy >> >> >> Cordialement / Best regards >> >> >> Abdelkader Midani >> Senior Software Engineer >> >> T +33 1 44 79 37 99 | M +33 6 72 57 93 40 >> 8 rue du Sentier | 75002 Paris | France >> jahia.com <http://www.jahia.com/> >> SKYPE <skype:abdelkader.midani?add> | TWITTER >> <https://twitter.com/M_Abdel> | VCARD >> <http://www.jahia.com/vcard/MidaniAbdelkader.vcf> >> >> >> >>> JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/> to evaluate, get trained and to >>> discover why >> Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for Digital >> Transformation. >> >>> On 2 Dec 2015, at 10:27, Serge Huber <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> As we are getting closer to a first release (yeah !), I’d like to >>> propose something about the version number of Apache Unomi. >>> >>> Currently it is at 2.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT, which was mostly to >>> differentiate from the 1.0.X version that we had outside of Apache, >>> but I’m thinking more and more this doesn’t make much sense from the >>> Apache point of view. >>> >>> I’d like to propose that we go to 1.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT and >>> therefore our first release would be at 1.0.0-incubating. I’m not that >>> found of 0.x numbers, especially since in my company we consider the >>> current code as good enough for production environments, and I >>> generally tend to think that if something can be used in production it >>> should have a “major” version number. >>> >>> However this does beg the question of how do we map the Unomi version >>> number to the CXS specification. As the specification is still >>> evolving, I propose that we do something similar to what Apache Tomcat >>> has done and provide a version mapping page such as this one : >>> https://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html and that we can then >>> freely perform releases of working and useful code and still map it to >>> the spec as we want. >>> >>> What do you think ? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Serge… >>> >>> ps : lazy consensus will apply here :) >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
