Hi, Yes, I think we can put the fixes in the release - the most complex is the UNOMI-14 , but the previous merge code was actually not really usable, it anyway works better now. If everybody agrees, I'll push them this morning.
thomas On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > it's up to you: > > 1. Regarding UNOMI-17, I think it deserve a fix in karaf-maven-plugin > (it's on my bucket), so it can wait the next release > 2. Regarding UNOMI-14, UNOMI-15 & UNOMI-16, if you are confident, we can > include for the first release. > > I would like to submit the release to vote this afternoon. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB > > On 02/05/2016 10:58 AM, Thomas Draier wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> @Thomas: do you still have some work in progress or is it OK for the > >> release ? > >> > >> > > I was waiting for the release to push my changes. Or should we include > > them in 1.0.0 ? Fixed jiras are : UNOMI-14, UNOMI-15 and UNOMI-16 . > > > > thomas > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
