+1
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 02/05/2016 11:13 AM, Thomas Draier wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I think we can put the fixes in the release - the most complex is the
UNOMI-14 , but the previous merge code was actually not really usable, it
anyway works better now. If everybody agrees, I'll push them this morning.
thomas
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Thomas,
it's up to you:
1. Regarding UNOMI-17, I think it deserve a fix in karaf-maven-plugin
(it's on my bucket), so it can wait the next release
2. Regarding UNOMI-14, UNOMI-15 & UNOMI-16, if you are confident, we can
include for the first release.
I would like to submit the release to vote this afternoon.
Thoughts ?
Regards
JB
On 02/05/2016 10:58 AM, Thomas Draier wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:
@Thomas: do you still have some work in progress or is it OK for the
release ?
I was waiting for the release to push my changes. Or should we include
them in 1.0.0 ? Fixed jiras are : UNOMI-14, UNOMI-15 and UNOMI-16 .
thomas
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
