> On 14 Sep 2016, at 15:30, Serge Huber <shu...@jahia.com> wrote: > > I’m hoping we can use Karaf Cellar for direct clustering of Apache Unomi > nodes :)
I would argue that we should use semantic versioning for Unomi and unless, we have API-breaking changes, we probably should stick with v1.x for the ES / Karaf upgrade. 2.x should probably be reserved for when we finally have a CXS spec to implement. > cheers, > Serge… > >> On 14 sept. 2016, at 15:29, Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> wrote: >> >> We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And yes, a >> possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll have to >> handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal). >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber <shu...@jahia.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 for release >>> >>> +1 for Abdelkader >>> >>> +1 for Damien >>> >>> After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request to >>> upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more and it >>> seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once JB >>> has time to send us his modifications :) >>> >>> After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making it >>> possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a topic >>> for another mail :) >>> >>> cheers, >>> Serge… >>> >>>> On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>> What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a lot >>> of >>>> bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile, >>> ability >>>> to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last release. >>>> >>>> And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien Gaillard >>> as >>>> committers . Abdelakader already did a lot of fixes, and Damien started >>> to >>>> contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting patches >>> too. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> thomas >>> >>> >
