In case you’re wondering you can find the package tarballs (source+binaries) here :
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1005/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.1.0-incubating/ I’ll try to do some basic verifications but I guess we need some mentors to help us out with the release process :) Thanks guys ! cheers, Serge… > On 20 sept. 2016, at 16:53, Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I submit Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release to your vote. > > Staging Repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1005/ > > Git tag: > unomi-root-1.1.0-incubating > > Release Notes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12335442&styleName=&projectId=12319220 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Thanks, > Regards > thomas > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:04 PM Chris Laprun <clap...@jahia.com> wrote: > >> Done as well, only kept documentation one as we probably need to update >> the documentation with all the recent changes. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >>> On 20 Sep 2016, at 11:41, Quentin Lamerand <qlamer...@jahia.com> wrote: >>> >>> Done as well. >>> Regards, >>> Q >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Serge Huber <shu...@jahia.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Done from my side. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Serge… >>>> >>>>> On 20 sept. 2016, at 10:29, Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Ok, >>>>> >>>>> If everybody's ok for the release, I'll start the process asap. Can you >>>>> please review all resolved tickets you opened and close them if it's >> ok ? >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >>>> 3D%20UNOMI%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20AND%20reporter%20in%20( >>>> currentUser()) >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> >>>>> thomas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:29 PM Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We could probably go for a 2.0 when we upgrade ES and karaf . And >> yes, a >>>>>> possibility to use a non-embedded ES would be nice, but then we'll >> have >>>> to >>>>>> handle the cluster by ourself (which should not be a big deal). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:20 PM Serge Huber <shu...@jahia.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for Abdelkader >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for Damien >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After the release it would be great if we could merge my pull request >>>> to >>>>>>> upgrade to ElasticSearch 2.4.0. I’ve been testing it more and more >> and >>>> it >>>>>>> seems functional from my side. We should also upgrade to Karaf 4 once >>>> JB >>>>>>> has time to send us his modifications :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After that there are more things I’d like to improve (such as making >> it >>>>>>> possible to use a non-embedded ElasticSearch) but I think that’s a >>>> topic >>>>>>> for another mail :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> Serge… >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 14 sept. 2016, at 14:53, Thomas Draier <tdra...@jahia.com> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What would you think of starting a release 1.1.0 ? There have been a >>>>>>> lot of >>>>>>>> bug fixes, and some improvements on the API (privacy, user profile, >>>>>>> ability >>>>>>>> to post conditions, ..), and also a long time since the last >> release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And also, I would like to propose Abdelkader Midani and Damien >>>> Gaillard >>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> committers . Abdelakader already did a lot of fixes, and Damien >>>>>>> started to >>>>>>>> contribute just one month ago but already did some interesting >> patches >>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thomas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
