Ok thanks Bertrand, I know a few people that might be good to have as PMC members, apart from you and JB of course :) I need to check with them if they are interested in taking on such a role though.
Now of course if JB and you become PMCs we have nothing to do :) cheers, Serge... Serge Huber CTO & Co-Founder T +41 22 361 3424 9 route des Jeunes | 1227 Acacias | Switzerland jahia.com <http://www.jahia.com/> SKYPE | LINKEDIN <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergehuber> | TWITTER <https://twitter.com/sergehuber> | VCARD <http://www.jahia.com/vcard/HuberSerge.vcf> > JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/> to evaluate, get trained and to discover why Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for Digital Transformation. On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected] > wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:00 AM Serge Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...I guess I means we need to recruit some more people > > into the PPMC. Do these have to be committers first ?... > > It's fine to vote people directly into both roles if the PPMC trusts them. > > My view is that in a top-level Apache project committers can't do any > real harm, if they misbehave the PMC can just block their commit > access temporarily if needed, and in the extreme case they have no > formal decision power anyway - although their opinion is generally > taken very seriously, that's not a formal requirement. > > A problematic PMC member, on the other can, can be harder to manage as > kicking off a misbehaving PMC member is harder, they need to have done > something really wrong for that to happen. I've seen only a handful of > such events in 18 years of Apache activities. > > So I tend to be more cautious about electing PMC members and usually > like to see them operate for a while as committers first. > > That's just my view, and I have no reason to think there are any > problems in the Unomi community - I just wanted to mention these > considerations in view of graduating. > > -Bertrand >
