Hi, I just created a Jira about the KarafTestSupport :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-203 If you are ok, I can take it ;) regards, François Papon [email protected] Le 28/09/2018 à 11:29, Serge Huber a écrit : > Ok JB, > > I look forward to it ! Thanks might be a little crazy (I have 4 talks > to present next week) but we'll make time to do this. > > Regards, > Serge... > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:19 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Thanks the update Serge. >> >> I will create Jira about blueprint to scr. >> >> I propose to discuss next week about GraphQL and unomi with Karaf vineyard. >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> >> Le 27 sept. 2018 à 16:07, à 16:07, Serge Huber <[email protected]> a écrit: >>> Hello JB, >>> >>> Thanks for doing all that. >>> >>> Concerning the roadmap, we have issues in JIRA for everything except >>> the new UI contribution, but this will probably be opened as soon as >>> things are clearer on Jahia's side. I've attached each ticket to >>> future versions (1.4.0 or 2.0.0) so everything should be ok there. >>> >>> We actually are also missing a task to move from Blueprint to DS/SCR, >>> so the first step would be to create that ticket. Since you're >>> proposing to work on that could you also create the ticket ? >>> >>> I actually need to get back to work on the CDP GraphQL API >>> integration. I need to also update the branch because it's a bit >>> behind the latest commits. >>> >>> 2.4 would be fantastic, especially the new itests that have been very >>> difficult to get to work properly. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Serge... >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> as we already started to discuss all together, we are heading to >>>> graduation, proposing Apache Unomi as new Apache TLP project to the >>> IPMC. >>>> That's a process on which we are moving forward and we are on track. >>>> >>>> On the other hand, I would like also to discuss about more the >>> technical >>>> Unomi roadmap. >>>> >>>> I would split the roadmap in two topics: >>>> >>>> 1. Problems solved >>>> >>>> @Serge, can you provide us some update about specification or new >>> end >>>> user features you have in mind in future Unomi releases ? >>>> Do we already have Jira about that ? >>>> >>>> 2. Unomi ecosystem >>>> >>>> I have few actions in progress in my bucket: >>>> >>>> 2.1. Refactore Unomi to use DS/SCR instead of blueprint and have a >>> more >>>> fine grained Karaf features, leveraging Karaf 4.2.1 (and probably >>> 4.2.2 >>>> when it will be available). >>>> 2.2. Add the Unomi kafka "connector" injecting data in async mode to >>>> avoid bottleneck >>>> 2.3. PoC about Unomi with Karaf Vineyard (especially for GraphQL >>> part) >>>> 2.4. New devops/packaging of Unomi based on new features available in >>>> Karaf 4.2.x (docker, new way of building distribution, simplified >>> itests >>>> with "new" KarafTestSupport, ...) >>>> >>>> If you have actions or features in mind, please let us know. >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
