That's fine with me, but check with JB also.
cheers, Serge... On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:08 AM Francois Papon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just created a Jira about the KarafTestSupport : > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-203 > > If you are ok, I can take it ;) > > regards, > > François Papon > [email protected] > > Le 28/09/2018 à 11:29, Serge Huber a écrit : > > Ok JB, > > > > I look forward to it ! Thanks might be a little crazy (I have 4 talks > > to present next week) but we'll make time to do this. > > > > Regards, > > Serge... > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:19 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Thanks the update Serge. > >> > >> I will create Jira about blueprint to scr. > >> > >> I propose to discuss next week about GraphQL and unomi with Karaf vineyard. > >> > >> Thanks ! > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> Le 27 sept. 2018 à 16:07, à 16:07, Serge Huber <[email protected]> a écrit: > >>> Hello JB, > >>> > >>> Thanks for doing all that. > >>> > >>> Concerning the roadmap, we have issues in JIRA for everything except > >>> the new UI contribution, but this will probably be opened as soon as > >>> things are clearer on Jahia's side. I've attached each ticket to > >>> future versions (1.4.0 or 2.0.0) so everything should be ok there. > >>> > >>> We actually are also missing a task to move from Blueprint to DS/SCR, > >>> so the first step would be to create that ticket. Since you're > >>> proposing to work on that could you also create the ticket ? > >>> > >>> I actually need to get back to work on the CDP GraphQL API > >>> integration. I need to also update the branch because it's a bit > >>> behind the latest commits. > >>> > >>> 2.4 would be fantastic, especially the new itests that have been very > >>> difficult to get to work properly. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Serge... > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Hi guys, > >>>> > >>>> as we already started to discuss all together, we are heading to > >>>> graduation, proposing Apache Unomi as new Apache TLP project to the > >>> IPMC. > >>>> That's a process on which we are moving forward and we are on track. > >>>> > >>>> On the other hand, I would like also to discuss about more the > >>> technical > >>>> Unomi roadmap. > >>>> > >>>> I would split the roadmap in two topics: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Problems solved > >>>> > >>>> @Serge, can you provide us some update about specification or new > >>> end > >>>> user features you have in mind in future Unomi releases ? > >>>> Do we already have Jira about that ? > >>>> > >>>> 2. Unomi ecosystem > >>>> > >>>> I have few actions in progress in my bucket: > >>>> > >>>> 2.1. Refactore Unomi to use DS/SCR instead of blueprint and have a > >>> more > >>>> fine grained Karaf features, leveraging Karaf 4.2.1 (and probably > >>> 4.2.2 > >>>> when it will be available). > >>>> 2.2. Add the Unomi kafka "connector" injecting data in async mode to > >>>> avoid bottleneck > >>>> 2.3. PoC about Unomi with Karaf Vineyard (especially for GraphQL > >>> part) > >>>> 2.4. New devops/packaging of Unomi based on new features available in > >>>> Karaf 4.2.x (docker, new way of building distribution, simplified > >>> itests > >>>> with "new" KarafTestSupport, ...) > >>>> > >>>> If you have actions or features in mind, please let us know. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks ! > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >
