Looks like we are good to go on the NPM MD5 package. Jim Jagielski commented on LEGAL-212:
------------------------------------ That package is under a BSD-3 license; the work on which is was based is BSD-2. Both are fine. RC coming soon... - Dave On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Dave! > > Also, lets not call this the “Hate Train”!! We really appreciate your > thoroughness. It’s a big project with a lot of files so thank you for the > effort! It only helps to make the project better. > > Rod > > -- > *Rod Simpson* > T @rockerston > W rodsimpson.com > > On December 16, 2014 at 12:16:03 PM, Dave ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:47 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hate to continue the train... > > > > Can you please review the license of MD5 w/ legal? > > https://www.npmjs.com/package/MD5 > > > I just asked legal for a ruling: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-212 > > > In addition, intro.js seems to be a MIT license but is not called as such > > https://github.com/usablica/intro.js > > > > Things you may want to list in your notice file. > > > > I'll add them both now. > > - Dave > >
