I would suggest ufw. This seems to be more inline with unbuntu the way to manage the OS firewall.
AP On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Aaron Coburn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Folks, > I have only just started working with Ubuntu images in the VCL, so forgive me > for any ignorance here. However, because the default Ubuntu install uses ufw > instead of iptables, I added a local version of `firewall_compare_update` in > OS::Linux::Ubuntu. This is in line with how 2.3.2 works. This local version > checks for the ufw service instead of iptables; otherwise, the two versions > are the same. I have pushed the change into both the 2.3-bugfix line and also > on trunk. > > After looking at the code in trunk some more, however, it appears that, > throughout the Ubuntu module, the code is checking for the 'iptables' service: > > $self->service_exists("iptables") > > instead of "ufw". Is this correct? > > If "iptables" is the intended service, then I will roll back my changes. > > -Aaron Coburn > > > > -- > Aaron Coburn > Academic Technology Services, Amherst College > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > > > > > -- Aaron Peeler Program Manager Virtual Computing Lab NC State University All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
