ok, sounds great.
Thanks,
AP

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Aaron Coburn <[email protected]> wrote:
> OK, I'll update the other service_exists() calls in the Ubuntu module in 
> trunk.
>
> AC
>
> On Jul 17, 2013, at 8:56 AM, Aaron Peeler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I would suggest ufw. This seems to be more inline with unbuntu the way
>> to manage the OS firewall.
>>
>> AP
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Aaron Coburn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi, Folks,
>>> I have only just started working with Ubuntu images in the VCL, so forgive 
>>> me for any ignorance here. However, because the default Ubuntu install uses 
>>> ufw instead of iptables, I added a local version of 
>>> `firewall_compare_update` in OS::Linux::Ubuntu. This is in line with how 
>>> 2.3.2 works. This local version checks for the ufw service instead of 
>>> iptables; otherwise, the two versions are the same. I have pushed the 
>>> change into both the 2.3-bugfix line and also on trunk.
>>>
>>> After looking at the code in trunk some more, however, it appears that, 
>>> throughout the Ubuntu module, the code is checking for the 'iptables' 
>>> service:
>>>
>>> $self->service_exists("iptables")
>>>
>>> instead of "ufw". Is this correct?
>>>
>>> If "iptables" is the intended service, then I will roll back my changes.
>>>
>>> -Aaron Coburn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Aaron Coburn
>>> Academic Technology Services, Amherst College
>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Aaron Peeler
>> Program Manager
>> Virtual Computing Lab
>> NC State University
>>
>> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>



-- 
Aaron Peeler
Program Manager
Virtual Computing Lab
NC State University

All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Reply via email to