Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Velocity Wiki" for 
change notification.

The following page has been changed by NathanBubna:
http://wiki.apache.org/velocity/VelocityTools2Planning

The comment on the change is:
add some notes/plans for how & where to keep backward compatibility with 1.x

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  5. SupportAlternateToolboxConfiguration: Not everyone likes XML.  I'd like us 
to make Toolbox management pluggable with provided support for configuration 
via properties file as well as XML, and i want it to be easier to configure and 
manage in Java as well. (STATUS: done, but needs testing)
  
+ 6. Simplify the package structure of VelocityTools.  There are a lot of 
sub-packages that seem redundant or unnecessary.  I'd like to shift things 
about as much as possible to reduce that. (STATUS: partly done)
+ 
+ == Backwards Compatibility For VelocityTools 2.x ==
+ 
+ 1. Basic user interfaces - these are things that people use directly without 
extending
+   * Our tools - the biggest thing here is the tools themselves.  we shouldn't 
make users have to change their templates at all.  we might consider finding 
some way to provide deprecation notices for things we'd like to change, but i 
don't think there's many places we'll need to do that.  in the meantime, the 
most we may do is move packages, add setup() methods, and put deprecated 
subclasses with init() and configure() support in the old tool locations. 
(STATUS: nothing to be done yet)
+   * Custom tools - the trick will be to support the init() and configure() 
methods.  Not sure how this will work, but i'm pretty determined to find a way. 
(STATUS: not done yet)
+   * Servlets - A lot of people directly use the VVS and VLS.  So, while i've 
moved them to a new package, there are  deprecated subclasses at their old 
location to make this a seamless transition for these folks. (STATUS: done)
+   * toolbox.xml - We need to create a !FactoryConfiguration that can 
translate the old xml configuration format to fit the new tool management 
structure.  This should not be too difficult.  The trickier part is where we 
should automatically check for the old format (probably in the deprecated VVS 
and deprecated VLS, at least).  Some thought may need to be put into this.  
Anyway, the goal is to not force people to update their configurations right 
away. (STATUS: not done yet)
+   * Logging stuff - The old !CommonsLog-!LogSystem bridges are deprecated and 
now extend their successors, the !CommonsLog-!LogChute implementations.  I now 
think that CommonsLogLogChute belongs in Engine, not Tools, but it will have to 
have a copy here until at least the Engine 1.6 release.  Also, !ServletLogger 
is deprecated and extends its successor, ServletLogChute.  For all of these, 
the transition should be seamless for users also using Engine 1.5. (STATUS: 
done)
+   * !WebappLoader - This has been deprecated and now extends its successor, 
!WebappResourceLoader, which is better named and has logging improvements to 
match those of the other loaders in Engine 1.5.  Again, upgrading to 2.x should 
not break anything for users also using Engine 1.5. (STATUS: done)
+ 
+ 2. Common extension points - places where people extend the tools, servlets
+   * Servlet subclasses - we need to support this as much as possible. 
(STATUS: partly done)
+   * Tool subclasses that change init() or configure() - if we meet all the 
goals in #1 above, then this should happen automatically for the most part.  we 
just need to leave our init() and configure() methods in place, so that calls 
to super.init() or super.configure() do not fail.
+ 
+ 3. Advanced API users - those that use tool management without using the 
servlets (e.g. Spring MVC or "standalone" toolbox users)
+   * !ViewContext users - can use deprecated one at old location for now 
(STATUS: done)
+   * !ChainedContext users - !ChainedContext can extend !ViewToolContext, but 
what to do about setToolbox()? (STATUS: not done)
+   * XML!ToolboxManager users - may be possible to hack up a version that 
reads old toolbox.xml format, and returns a Map of initialized tools for 
getToolbox(initData), but that initData part is tricky.  partial support is 
probably the best we can do here, unless we leave all the old code intact and 
just deprecate it.
+   * !ServletToolboxManager users - similar situation to that of 
XML!ToolboxManager, but worse.  again, probably a choice between partial 
integration with new infrastructure or else leaving both infrastructures 
side-by-side with one deprecated.
+ 
+ 4. Anyone else that digs further into the tool management API for 1.x - 
Unless we decide to only deprecate the old tool management infrastructure, 
these people shouldn't upgrade until they're ready to make a lot of changes. :)
+ 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to