Actually, after several years of quiet on the development front, the last year has seen some pretty significant improvements in Velocity. See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:changelog-panel
Rather than sniping, how about some concrete ideas for what you'd like to see next? Or better yet, since you are hanging out in the developer list, some test cases or patches? WILL On 5/3/07, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Basically removing all the @author tags from the velocity code base >>> and docs and replacing it with 'Velocity development community' and a >>> link to the dev-list. >>> >>> How about doing this? >> -1 from me as a user. > >> In a lot of projects when I had problems, I was able to ask directly the author(s) >> of that class/utility, and this was very helpful. The complete project was too big >> and the work of just too many people. > > Yes, and this is excactly what we want to get rid of. None of the code > is owned by any of us and sometimes the person named in the source is > not even any longer around. That is the whole point of community. I don't think it's a good idea to get rid of exactly that thing :). My experience is that for a lot of open source projects, the so called "active community" is full of *zealots* that are ready all the time to rip the new user's request apart instead of helping. In most cases however, the author is very kind and helps, and most of the time knows better why he "designed that thing so", or just has very useful "insider information". Maybe you want to avoid contacting the authors, but that is the main reason people still use many of those projects (and in many cases hire them as consultants :) ). > If you want to know, which committer wrote a specific line of code > (which is much more interesting than who is mentioned in a file), use > svn blame or the subversion viewer. That is what tools are there for. Of course :). However just reading what's on the screen takes less than a second, and most from the "Human Resources" have no ideas about such tools :). >> Do you really think the users do care so much about "cosmetics" when the concurrent >> products/technologies get real improvements? > > At least I do not really care about 'products' or 'technologies'. This "vision" from you can be really seen in the "evolution of Velocity" in the last few years, don't you think? :). Ahmed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
