Ok, I agree. I turn this into a 0 vote.
Ciao
Henning
Nathan Bubna schrieb:
> The reflection problem in 1.6 is obscure, but also not going to have a
> simple workaround when it happens. The macro context problem is easy
> to workaround but will be more common and annoying. Neither is
> terribly severe, but my time is getting increasingly precious as the
> new year approaches, and i can less afford to be working on Velocity.
> I definitely can rebuild the release, but i absolutely do not consider
> a missing license header on a test case worth the time and effort.
> There is no realistic or practical reason that the lack of that header
> will be problematic for anyone. Even in theory, it is a stretch to
> see a show-stopping problem with this.
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Then I missed it back then, which is my mistake.
>>
>> Bad timng: Yes, probably, is the problem in 1.6 so severe that it does
>> not allow rebuilding the tarballs?
>>
>> I am willing to lift it to a 0 if there are pressing reasons. However,
>> it definitely should be fixed in SVN.
>>
>> Ciao
>> Henning
>>
>>
>>
>> Nathan Bubna schrieb:
>>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Sorry, -1 due to this:
>>>>
>>>> !????? ./src/test/org/apache/velocity/test/StrictReferenceTestCase.java
>>> looks like it was that way when you ran RAT on 1.6 and gave that a +1.
>>> what gives? this is lousy timing; is this really worth the veto?
>>>
>>>> from the rat report. Please fix the license and prepare a new build.
>>>>
>>>> Ciao
>>>> Henning
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 07:38 -0800, Nathan Bubna wrote:
>>>>> Ok, there were no complaints about the latest 1.6.1 test build, so it
>>>>> is time to vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The test build candidate for release is still available here:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6.1/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as
>>>>> Velocity Engine 1.6.1:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Let's do it
>>>>> [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care.
>>>>> [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you.
>>>>> [ ] -1 No, because __________________
>>>>>
>>>>> The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as
>>>>> roughly 7am PST on Mon, Dec 15th. Vote early and vote often! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> if you didn't notice, a vararg method reflection bug (VELOCITY-651)
>>>>>> was found shortly after we got 1.6 released. it is now fixed, and i
>>>>>> think we need to do a bug fix release for it. it's not the sort of
>>>>>> thing that should wait around for a 1.7 release. so, here's a test
>>>>>> build for 1.6.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6.1/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please give it a look and a test. i'll probably call for a vote on
>>>>>> Tuesday. i'm aiming for a Fri (12/12) release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> nathan
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Java, J2EE, Linux
>>>> Mail: [email protected] -- Consultant, Architect, Developer
>>>> Web: http://henning.schmiedehausen.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [email protected]
>>
>> "Save the cheerleader. Save the world."
>>
--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [email protected]
"Save the cheerleader. Save the world."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
