On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Byron Foster <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:22 , Claude Brisson wrote: > >> Rather confusing vote indeed... half of the votes ended up on the >> private list, and there was a conditional vote. >> >> I think we should just cc the votes to the private list so that busy >> people see it, but dev should stay the main list for votes. >> >> I got: >> >> +1 from Henning >> +1 from Will >> (conditional) +1 from Nathan >> >> Byron didn't vote but expressed some reserves (please, next time, >> express an integer opinion :-) ) > > Sorry, I should have been more clear, my vote would have been +0 for what it > matters now. I wasn't sure if issue 681 affected the very process of voting.
Nope. It can affect votes, but there's nothing requiring issues to be resolved for a release. To do a release, technically you just need a positive (more +1 than -1) vote total with at least 3 PMC +1s being the minimum and a willing and able release manager. In practice, we've never released if any committer or PMC member voted -1, and we've definitely left unresolved issues before. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
