Rather confusing vote indeed... half of the votes ended up on the private list, and there was a conditional vote.
I think we should just cc the votes to the private list so that busy people see it, but dev should stay the main list for votes. I got: +1 from Henning +1 from Will (conditional) +1 from Nathan Byron didn't vote but expressed some reserves (please, next time, express an integer opinion :-) ) Facing this lukewarm result, I wondered what to do, plus I didn't exactly know what to vote myself. So I made some tests and I really think there is something broken with macro parameters in 1.6.2. So I vote -1. I'll elaborate about the tests I made on JIRA. Claude On mar, 2009-01-27 at 12:37 +0100, Claude Brisson wrote: > Yet another candidate release for 1.6.2, and this time I directly > attempt a vote... > > The release is available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/engine/1.6.2/ > > So, time to release this build as 1.6.2? > > [ ] +1 Let's do it > [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. > [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. > [ ] -1 No, because __________________ > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours, I'll probably let it run up to > Saturday morning. > > > Claude > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: private-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: private-h...@velocity.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
