On 2010-09-19, Antonio Petrelli wrote: > I noticed that Gump is failing. Since Gump is a bit outdated, why > don't we move to Hudson instead?
Gump and Hudson fill very different needs Gump is not a CI system. Gump will tell you if Velocity can't upgrade in the future because of a change in commons-collections - Hudson won't. IMHO it is not an either or, but a do both. If you folks feel you want to drop Gump builds, we will simply turn of email messages but still keep at least building those Velocity projects that others depend on - at least as long as we can keep them building. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
