On 09/20/2010 05:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-09-19, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
I noticed that Gump is failing. Since Gump is a bit outdated, why
don't we move to Hudson instead?
Gump and Hudson fill very different needs
Gump is not a CI system. Gump will tell you if Velocity can't upgrade
in the future because of a change in commons-collections - Hudson won't.
IMHO it is not an either or, but a do both.
Actually you can do something related in Hudson as well, using the Clirr
plugin for Maven.
http://clirr.sourceforge.net/
http://mojo.codehaus.org/clirr-maven-plugin/
If you folks feel you want to drop Gump builds, we will simply turn of
email messages but still keep at least building those Velocity projects
that others depend on - at least as long as we can keep them building.
Stefan
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
