I haven't looked at commons configuration in years. I'm randomly perusing it now. I like what i see. It does seem a bit heavy, but i suppose it provides a lot more config options than we currently do. Considering Engine's position as a library/component project, that's a plus. Let people configure as they need. I also like their support for configuration events; interesting possibilities there.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > I noticed that, in Velocity Engine, the dependency on Commons > Collections is due to the use of ExtendedProperties and LRUMap. > > I know what to do with LRUMap (shade the needed classes of Commons > Collections), however I think ExtendedProperties could be replaced > with Commons Configuration. So, if we want, we can move from simple > properties files to other types (e.g. XML, servlet parameters) with no > extra effort. Moreover Commons Configuration allows loading multiple > sources: this is important to me since I would like to implement, > later, the ability to load configuration from multiple files (for > example to load user directives from various JARs automatically, > without configuration). > > WDYT? > > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
