2010/11/29 Nathan Bubna <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Antonio Petrelli > <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2010/11/29 Adrian Tarau <[email protected]>: >>> What I wanted to say is to follow the model and not to include any >>> dependency. >> >> Ok >> >>> A minimal functionality should be to set/get primitive types and >>> work with lists and store everything behind as strings(with "," as separator >>> for lists). >> >> Not entirely true, only "gets" are needed, since configuration is read-only. > > at least it is at the present...
Sure, but at that point we can use some well-established patterns, like a "MutableThingy", with setters/adders, and then use a specific implementation to serialize it. Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
