I did just notice that the core is dependent on commons-collections/lang/logging. Not as excited about that, but probably still ok, i guess.
http://commons.apache.org/configuration/dependencies.html On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Nathan Bubna <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven't looked at commons configuration in years. I'm randomly > perusing it now. I like what i see. It does seem a bit heavy, but i > suppose it provides a lot more config options than we currently do. > Considering Engine's position as a library/component project, that's a > plus. Let people configure as they need. I also like their support > for configuration events; interesting possibilities there. > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Antonio Petrelli > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all >> I noticed that, in Velocity Engine, the dependency on Commons >> Collections is due to the use of ExtendedProperties and LRUMap. >> >> I know what to do with LRUMap (shade the needed classes of Commons >> Collections), however I think ExtendedProperties could be replaced >> with Commons Configuration. So, if we want, we can move from simple >> properties files to other types (e.g. XML, servlet parameters) with no >> extra effort. Moreover Commons Configuration allows loading multiple >> sources: this is important to me since I would like to implement, >> later, the ability to load configuration from multiple files (for >> example to load user directives from various JARs automatically, >> without configuration). >> >> WDYT? >> >> Antonio >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
