(sorry, truncated mail)

I was pretty sure of that, kinda not really scared :-)

Yes, Tiles abstractions look quite interesting, I'm a bit more dubitative about JSPs, since raw tools are so handy, but maybe there is a crucial JSP library I'm not aware of.


  Claude

The use of JSPs, especially,

On 09/12/2010 16:59, Claude Brisson wrote:
I was pretty sure of that,

On 09/12/2010 13:59, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2010/12/9 Claude Brisson<cla...@renegat.net>:
On 09/12/2010 11:16, Antonio Petrelli wrote:

[...]

About something in a distant future, we can remove the dependency on
servlets technology for Velocity Tools.

This objective looks rather strange, and quite scaring to me. JSPs is not
everyone's choice, neither is Tiles or Struts. Using Tools within a plain
J2EE servlet can also be a very good choice.

As long as everything is done to let developers decide what they want to
use, I've of course nothing against it, though.
Don't be scared, the removal of the dependency does not mean the
removal of support!
What I meant is using an abstraction of what we need of servlets (in
particular a request/response pair and a writer) to allow the use in
other environments, in particular portlets.
I never meant to remove servlet *support*.

Antonio

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:dev-h...@velocity.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org

Reply via email to