On 06/02/2015 10:15 PM, mkien...@apache.org wrote: > +In the event that something 'serious' changes, such as an AST node is created > +or altered, it must be *manually* moved to the node subdirectory, and have > its > +package declaration fixed. This should be an extremely rare event at this > point > +and will change with javacc 2.0.
Since we already require JavaCC 3.2+ does the "will change with javacc 2.0" part make sense? > +-gmj I'd remove this ^ -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
