Yeah, that bothered me as well, but I'm no expert on the parser, so I didn't want to guess whether it was still applicable. If I didn't know, I left the original readme as-is. Java 3.1 has been required since 1.5, so it's been "wrong" for a long time.
Please feel free to improve it further. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumit...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/02/2015 10:15 PM, mkien...@apache.org wrote: >> +In the event that something 'serious' changes, such as an AST node is >> created >> +or altered, it must be *manually* moved to the node subdirectory, and have >> its >> +package declaration fixed. This should be an extremely rare event at this >> point >> +and will change with javacc 2.0. > > Since we already require JavaCC 3.2+ does the "will change with javacc > 2.0" part make sense? > >> +-gmj > > I'd remove this ^ > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org
