Hi Steven, I understood Preston's proposal to mean that we use git instead of svn, but keep everything else the same. I can see how that simplifies our tool chain (and I like the idea :) ), but not how it would improve the process. Could you elaborate a bit more?
Thanks, Till > On May 3, 2015, at 21:32, Steven Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it would make things more convenient. Based on Asterix experience, > would it be part of the same git project? The doc update process over there > still seems a little complicated to me. I was wondering if having it as > part of a separate git project might be better. > Steven > >> On Sunday, May 3, 2015, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> From monitoring a different apache project, it sounds like we could use git >> to manage our website. Is this something we should look into? It would be >> nice to standardize on git for our project. >> >> What do you think? >>
