I just had a clarifying discussion with Preston, and I withdraw my comment :) +1 to his suggestion Steven
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Steven, > > I understood Preston's proposal to mean that we use git instead of svn, > but keep everything else the same. I can see how that simplifies our tool > chain (and I like the idea :) ), but not how it would improve the process. > Could you elaborate a bit more? > > Thanks, > Till > > > On May 3, 2015, at 21:32, Steven Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think it would make things more convenient. Based on Asterix > experience, > > would it be part of the same git project? The doc update process over > there > > still seems a little complicated to me. I was wondering if having it as > > part of a separate git project might be better. > > Steven > > > >> On Sunday, May 3, 2015, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> From monitoring a different apache project, it sounds like we could use > git > >> to manage our website. Is this something we should look into? It would > be > >> nice to standardize on git for our project. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> >
