Hi,

I have managed to create a PR[1] with no conflicts.

[1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/118

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
Riyafa

On 26 July 2016 at 10:23, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Riyafa,
>
> this PR also contains a number of changes that are already in master.
> Somehow it seems that we’ve managed to confuse some git repositories.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
>
> On 25 Jul 2016, at 19:17, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I also added the changes to general comparison semantics to the same
>> PR[1].
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/109
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Riyafa
>>
>> On 26 July 2016 at 06:44, Riyafa Abdul Hameed <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I removed the else tag and now only have the if tag[1]. I will do some
>>> refactoring because it has conflicts with the master once the code is
>>> reviewed.
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/109
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Yours sinerely,
>>> Riyafa
>>>
>>> On 26 July 2016 at 00:15, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I think that - even though it’s probably slower - it’s fine to keep the
>>>> null
>>>> check separate. The reason for me is that, it’s probably less error
>>>> prone
>>>> this way (and we can’t forget to add it to one of the sub-switches) and
>>>> it
>>>> clearly communicates intent in the code.
>>>> A hybrid solution could be to add the tid2 null check before and add the
>>>> tid1 check in the top-level switch. But that would need to be nicely
>>>> documented as the asymmetry could be confusing otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> My 2c,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>> On 25 Jul 2016, at 10:07, Riyafa Abdul Hameed wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I added the tests for all comparison checks (eq, ne, lt, gt, ge, le) as
>>>>> suggested[1]. Here I have used an if statement in the FunctionHelper
>>>>> class
>>>>> instead of checking for null tag inside switch statements because it
>>>>> would
>>>>> be tedious to add the null tag to all the switch statements for the
>>>>> tid2
>>>>> tag. Shall I proceed to attempt to add the null tag into all the switch
>>>>> statements or leave it as a if check?
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/109
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>> Riyafa
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 July 2016 at 16:34, Riyafa Abdul Hameed <[email protected]
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have made Changes to value comparison semantics for JSONiq[1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/vxquery/pull/109
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>>> Riyafa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Riyafa Abdul Hameed
>>>>>> Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>>> Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>> <http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf>  <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Riyafa Abdul Hameed
>>>>> Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>> Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
>>>>> <http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf>  <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
>>>>> <http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Riyafa Abdul Hameed
>>> Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
>>>
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
>>> <http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf>  <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
>>> <http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Riyafa Abdul Hameed
>> Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa
>>
>> Email: [email protected]
>> Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
>> <http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf>  <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
>> <http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>
>>
>


-- 
Riyafa Abdul Hameed
Undergraduate, University of Moratuwa

Email: [email protected]
Website: https://riyafa.wordpress.com/ <http://riyafa.wordpress.com/>
<http://facebook.com/riyafa.ahf>  <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/riyafa>
<http://twitter.com/Riyafa1>

Reply via email to