Hi, +0
I’m fine with both, but having both - I don’t know. But I support every decision :) Cheers, —Alex > On 18. Mar 2022, at 10:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems the GA coverage is pretty close to Travis, so, I think we can > remove Travis and focus on GA. > > My €0.01 ;) > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:41 PM Bertty Contreras <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> Today I ran one compilation and the differences between TravisCI and Github >> Actions in terms of start running the job does not have a comparison. >> >> Additionally to that @CalvinKirs migrate all the pipelines that we had in >> TravisCI to Github Action >> >> Do we remove TravisCI?? because at this moment it is just a redundant >> process. >> >> Best regards, >> Bertty
