Hi guys, But, wasn’t travis already been removed? :p
IMHO GitHub actions seems to be a good way to go :) Best, Jorge > On 20 Jan 2023, at 15.40, Alexander Alten <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > INFRA discontinues Travis, we need to discuss a timeline to move either to > GitHub actions or Jenkins, or other tools the ASF provides. I saw that our > website repo already has an .asf.yml, which is used for GH actions. > > —Alex > >> On 21. Mar 2022, at 14:05, Bertty Contreras <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> I will remove Travis then :D. >> >> Thank you for your opinions. >> >> Best regards, >> Bertty >> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:33 PM jorge Arnulfo Quiané Ruiz < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +0 no clear preference for me. I am fine with both >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 11:05 AM Bertty Contreras <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> the documentation step had problem even in TravisCI, and I will take care >>>> of it to have it done in GA:D >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:17 AM CalvinKirs <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At present, only the automatic push of documents has not been done, >>>>> because I am not familiar with it. In addition, all functions of >>> TravisCI >>>>> have been migrated to GithubAction >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes！ >>>>> Calvin Kirs >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 03/18/2022 17:07，Alexander Alten<[email protected]> wrote： >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> +0 >>>>> >>>>> I’m fine with both, but having both - I don’t know. But I support every >>>>> decision :) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> —Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 18. Mar 2022, at 10:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> It seems the GA coverage is pretty close to Travis, so, I think we can >>>>> remove Travis and focus on GA. >>>>> >>>>> My €0.01 ;) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:41 PM Bertty Contreras <[email protected] >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>> >>>>> Today I ran one compilation and the differences between TravisCI and >>>> Github >>>>> Actions in terms of start running the job does not have a comparison. >>>>> >>>>> Additionally to that @CalvinKirs migrate all the pipelines that we had >>> in >>>>> TravisCI to Github Action >>>>> >>>>> Do we remove TravisCI?? because at this moment it is just a redundant >>>>> process. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Bertty >>>>> >>>> >>> > > > -- > databloom AI, Inc. > > 3401 N. MIAMI AVE. STE 230 > 33127 Miami, Florida > United States > > > -- Please consider the environment before printing this > email -- > > > > Disclaimer: > The content of this message is confidential. If you > have received it by mistake, please inform us by an email reply and then > delete the message. It is forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal > the contents of this message to anyone. The integrity and security of this > email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will > not be held liable for any damage caused by the message. >
