Autohide can come in handy. But I think that the selection of topics, and
their location is very lacking. It's better organized than the current
website, that's for sure. But most of what I said about the organization
of the current site still applies (but to a lesser degree):
- Some terms can be made clearer ("submit bug/issue", "the press").
- others are verbose ("artiles, blogs, newsletter"),
- some are missing ("media kit", "documentation"),
- some shouldn't be on a front page ("product information", "screenshots",
"awards", "statistics")
- some are duplicated ("bugs & issues"),
- some are illogicaly arranged ("bugs & issues" under About OOo;
"contributing work" and "product roadmap" under "Developer Workbench";
"articles, blogs, newsletter" under "resources"),
- some can simply be made clearer ("OOo Forum" -> "Web Forums").
So... yes. Although the content is much better than the current page, it
can still be improved.
Cheers,
Daniel.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:04:58AM +1100, Matthew Wardrop wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Now I am just waiting for Alexandro's source.
>
> I take it you do not like the way I have set up the links? With autohide
> and such?
>
> I thought that if I segregated them as I did, it would make it much
> easier to use, with only a select few visible, and only those the user
> is currently interested in (short term memory).
>
> Take another look, and tell me what you think (P.S. It IS compatible
> with Netscape 4.78, I made it so).
>
> Kind Regards,
> --
> Matthew Wardrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Daniel Carrera | I know everything, I just can't remember
Join OOoAuthors today! | it all at once.
http://www.oooauthors.org | :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
