hi Nicu,
>Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: >> One thing we used to have on the homepage was a very brief >> explanation of what OOo the product is. I get a fair number of >> people wanting that again. But putting it there means putting a >> fair amount of text, which none of us particularly wants. People >> also feel the one-sentence blurb is inadequate; we've discussed that >> before, most will recall. >> >> So, here is a thought. Why not have in the graphic the five linked >> components of OOo 2.0 (in no discernable order): >> >> Write | Impress | Draw | Base | Calc >> >> with, below or above some brief explanation that it's an office >> suite, eg, "industry standard office suite" > >something like this? (but more polished) >http://ooo.nicubunu.ro/webicons/definition.png (those are the >application menu icons from m65) > Nice! But I was thinking of the graphic for 2.0 above then the text (not necessarily any icons) below. But you got it. >> The advantage of this arrangement is that it draws attention to the >> components and, I think, its interoperability with MS Office. One >> could even, should one want, make each of those links collapsible >> menus. > >not very sure about this. we may want to emphasize more at a later >time other components, like the ecuation editor or the html creator > Yes, but as Daniel keeps pointing out, we want to keep things simple to focus attention on the right things. My suggestion is meant to make it easier for people to see what OOo is without cluttering up the homepage. Thanks Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
