> > >Jacqueline McNally wrote: >> Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >>> I think many people has contribute to this topic and many are >>> comming to agree with some aspects of the website. I think that we >>> should start talking about an implementation date for the website. >>> This is important so we can 'move forward'. I think the developers >>> (guys who have access to the code) should schedule the day and >>> announce it on the list so we all come to a general agreement. >>> >>> Feedback please. >>> >> >> In just over a week the issue of invigorating the home page has >> occurred amongst a few people. Taking time zones and the various >> stake holders in to account, e.g. NL projects, this is a little >> time. With the result of similarly reworked pages. > >> >> Wrt to deadlines, I don't think we should make them up along the >> way, but decide and work towards them. If it is 2.0, we have a while >> yet, but I think in the meantime can replace the image if there are >> some suggestions in the repository. If not, then even when 2.0 is >> available, 2.0 is only going to be news for a little while and we >> will need new images. >> >> I intend to invite a lot more people to comment and submit ideas. >> Aren't you? > >Right you are, Jacquiline! My feeling is this "stylistic" change >should rightly be propated to the WHOLE project. Given that, yes >indeed, it needs further review and feedback from all before >implementation. > >I was expecting that once things were definitively "done" and uploaded >to the tryouts area, we might put out a message to the Project Leads >list. > >> >> Regards Jacqueline >> +1
Cheers Louis PS of course, we can certainly improve now the visibility and paths of those links most used, eg, to downloads, to ancillary content users of OOo might want. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
