I can't imagine why all this red tape is necessary. The project leads are not web designers or usability experts. Those who are should be subscribed to this list. Instead you propose asking the approval of people who were never involved in the process, don't know the design goals, the principles employed, or the usability concerns, that led to the creation of this site. In other words, you choose a process that only invites failure.
Sincerely, Daniel. On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:54:49AM -0800, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > > Earlier last week week [1] I suggested 28 January a deadline for > informal critique of proposals by this group. After that a two-week > window for review by the project leads (project_leads@), leaving us > 14-15 of February or so. > > I would like to keep that schedule. > > To date we have one rather nice proposal that most of us like. Maarten > had stated shortly before the weekend he would submit another proposal, > one that sought to address the problems differently. > > Both Kay and I agreed on this deadline. That does not mean we should > stop work on the favorite. Far from it, and I thought I had communicated > that. > > Regards, > Louis > > > [1] http://website.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=6251 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Daniel Carrera | There is no urge so great as for one man to Join OOoAuthors today! | edit another man's work. http://www.oooauthors.org | -- Mark Twain --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
