oh boy, SO much in here, please see below...

:murb: [maarten brouwers] wrote:
Hi all,

The discussion on the removal of the !important statements seems to halt... No good. There are a few problems:

We want to launch a new website soon, but:
1. there is no staging server
2. a conservative sound is heard when only minor changes are proposed to the global css
  (and an even more conservative sound is expected
   when we are to change the global headers and
   footers)
3. it is incredibly hard to understand the current CSS soup, on top of which we are expected, because of 2., to launch a new site 4. it is already hard to design simple things at the domain openoffice.org, because of 3.

This is a situation we can't maintain forever. We need to think of how to proceed. We, as the website group, are responsible for a good website, and we have a bad website. We need to take responsibility.

Since we have no staging server, we can't guarantee a 100% fluent transition, however, we can do our utmost best to make it such one by reviewing the diff's on this website before committing. Since that won't give us a 100% guarantee, we have to inform the users, just like we have done in the past with a Collabnet (~up)grade during this period. It is simply the best we can do... Apart from standing still and changing nothing. The current situation is so frustrating that it makes more sense creating a new domain, and start with people who are enthusiastic a new portal from scratch for OpenOffice.org. But such split of community is not desirable. But tend to see this as an alternative which becomes increasingly more interesting, which I hate to say.

So I propose to focus on a process of change (I do not have any relationship with Obama ;) ), and make sure that it is a change that does not interfere with everyday operation too much. This requires a plan. A first rough draft:

0. announce on the website that we are working on the website, which may cause minor inconveniences. in case major sections break, please notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. 1. delete all !important statements (of which none are related to display nones etc., but only colour or text decoration) 2. introduce the new html code needed for the new design to work to the header and footer files (e.g. the tabbed search, login etc., and the new tabs with as style attribute: display:none (this can, but only for testing in the tryouts area, be overridden with !important statements in a manually included css file) - the introduction of this code is first approved in a discussion at this list.

boy oh boy! OK, I've got the latest version in tryouts just now. Without boring you with what I did to do this (changing a few url refs in the style sheet), I don't think what you're proposing would work at all, Maarten. Sorry about this. I think what WOULD work is for someone with some appropriate access to put the styling we've already got (we'd need to break up the header and footer styles) and dump them into new styles in "/branding" then get whoever at Collabnet to do some magic to allow these to be used as standards ONLY on pages in a particular area of the server, presumably /tryouts/Jan2008. I would be willing to bet this could be done...hopefully! :/ Or, alternatively, let this business go for now and just remember to append /nonav to tryouts. This is working pretty good for me right now.

But your suggestion has merit in terms of how some of this would work with the remainder of the site that doesn't get transformed! :{

3. finish the website in the tryouts area
This part shouldn't be too bad, well for the most part. We can always dump unfixed test pages in to see what happens.
4. upload the new content files, to www
5. remove the old header items, and remove display:none attribute of the new ones (I am afraid that this will result, albeit for minutes, in a messy appearance, maybe we can refine this point)
6. start actually enjoying the website again.

I know, I'm looking at things from a progressive point of view, and rather see the site break ugly temporarily than continue with the current site in a ramshackle state. But we have agreed on a change in look, we are working on it all together... we need to take the final steps as well before we can actually implement it. Let's figure out how we can do this smoothly. Input much appreciated.

I'm VERY concerned about the complexity of the new header design vs what we have now, if you want to know the truth. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how this plays out.



g.,

Maarten

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
============================================================
Kay Schenk
"As anyone who has ever been around a cat for any length of
time well knows, cats have enormous patience with the limitations of the human mind." --Cleveland Amory


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to