Hi Christian, Kay, Louis, and all others of course, > Starting small (with the #important-decls) is a good thing as well. And > while I fear that the site will render strange for some time, I'm still > in favor of doing it. (Although I'm still pessimistic when it comes to > the next site-upgrade (when/if it comes))
Indeed, if it comes. I think we simply should not accept an override of the stylesheets in that case. If a new version of issuezilla, for example, does need new CSS, we'll make the changes ourselves. > I'm sorry if my "one needs to be careful when changing it" sounded like > "I'm against changing it" - this is not the case. It just means: I did indeed interpret it kind of in that way... my apologies. > * you risk of disturbing the site (so make small changes you can trace > back in case somebody complains) I fully acknowledge this. > * you probably need to do the same thing another time someday (so plan > ahead, use ids/classes you can identify as our own so that we can dump > the "new old thing" (new default CEE stylesheat) easily, without the > need to triple check everything Good idea. Also, I liked your suggestion: > But if it is fine to apply the sign to the whole webstite project, and > not only the tryouts area, then we can do it ourselves (can use > "#if ($currentProject.getName() == "website")" in the templates) This may allow us to experiment without the hassle of CSS hide and unhide of <div>-blocks. Can we turn the entire website.openoffice.org in our playground (as it is not a really important page), or could Louis create a new project for testing? I would like to see the !important statements in the look project as soon as possible though, as they are breaking the 'button' styles, as used at the download page etc. If people start complaining about that it is an easy thing to revert. g., Maarten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
