Okay. Should I use the same RC version or a new one? On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Raphael Bircher <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Sospartan, > > Maybe call for a new vote on Incubator. Now. they are back from the > ApacheCon, so you have a good chance to get answer. > > Regards, Raphael > > > Am .05.2017, 10:08 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <[email protected]>: > > Hi raphael, >> There still needs more +1 vote. >> Would you like help us to appeal the IPMC members to review this release? >> >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Raphael Bircher < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> You can just download the tarball during the build process. this is done >>> by many other Apache process. That would probably solve this problem. >>> >>> Regards, Raphael >>> >>> >>> Am .05.2017, 11:31 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Another related problem: Since all binary files and pre-build files were >>> >>>> removed, which >>>> will add more steps to build from source we released. For example, >>>> people >>>> have to >>>> install gradle first because gradle warpper is not come with the source >>>> tarball. >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM, sospartan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The binaries were all excluded in this release. >>>> >>>>> In previous release we do include a gradle wrapper jar and v8 library >>>>> (a >>>>> .so file). I've double >>>>> checked this issue in current release. This is no longer a problem. :P >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Raphael Bircher < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Sospartan >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> leave it open a little bit longer, remember, many peoples are at the >>>>>> ApacheCon. >>>>>> >>>>>> A question about the release. Is it true that you have a binary tar.gz >>>>>> in >>>>>> the release folder? under witch license are this binaries? As far as I >>>>>> know, the normal way under Apache is to host such binaries outside ASF >>>>>> infrastructure. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, Raphael >>>>>> >>>>>> Am .05.2017, 07:49 Uhr, schrieb sospartan <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Rapheal, >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote received 1 +1 binding, and the time is pass 72 hours as I >>>>>>> declared >>>>>>> in the first mail. >>>>>>> Should I announce the vote is failed? Or 1 +1 is enough to pass the >>>>>>> release >>>>>>> vote? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards! >>>>> >>>>> sospartan >>>>> http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU >>> >>> >> >> >> > > -- > My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU > -- Best Regards! sospartan http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
