Going back through my mails, I realized I failed to answer one of your questions. My apologies.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:24 AM 申远 <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. If the corresponding code is owned by Alibaba, and someone represented > the company would sign the SGA, is there any necessary to have all the > contributors signed the SGA again? > I believe that would be sufficient, but you should ask the legal committee. (See below.) 2. From my point of view, there will be lots of copyright / trademark > issues around, as none of the PPMC member is lawyer, Is there anyone from > Apache we can consult about the law issue? > There is! This is one of the services ASF provides for its projects. You can email [email protected] or, if it's something that needs to be kept private [email protected]. You may prefer to submit a JIRA ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LEGAL) You can get more information here: https://www.apache.org/legal/ > 3. weex-toolkit is already an open source project under MIT license, would > it violate any copyright / trademark rules/laws if we fork the original > weex-toolkit and push it to Apache repos. > I believe it would be allowed, because the MIT license is a category A license. But I suggest you ask someone with more legal know-how (see above). It may not accomplish your purposes unless you convince the developers there to start doing their work here. If they were to continue working over there, it would be problematic because the Weex PMC wouldn't be able to participate in decisions about who commits or what they commit. Best Regards, Myrle
